Evaluations
Rubric v1 · 5 dims · LLM-as-judge (DeepSeek). Each row is an analysis scored 1–5 per dim.
Cost & usage
Total spend
$0.2709
n = 116
Avg per analysis
$0.00234
Avg latency
11411ms
↑ / ↓ tokens
223.6k / 191.4k
Excludes the streaming /api/analyze path — usage isn't reachable from that flow (limitation, not a bug). Includes batch evals + scenario runs + re-runs.
Average by prompt version
| key | n | overall | Specificity | Safety | Actionability | Domain correctness | Completeness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | 49 | 4.58 | 4.61 | 4.04 | 4.61 | 4.92 | 4.71 |
| v2 | 52 | 4.41 | 4.54 | 3.98 | 4.54 | 4.81 | 4.17 |
| v3 | 34 | 4.58 | 4.71 | 4.00 | 4.71 | 4.79 | 4.68 |
Average by output language
| key | n | overall | Specificity | Safety | Actionability | Domain correctness | Completeness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en | 67 | 4.60 | 4.72 | 4.07 | 4.72 | 4.91 | 4.60 |
| zh | 68 | 4.42 | 4.50 | 3.94 | 4.50 | 4.78 | 4.40 |
Individual evaluations (135)
- v2zh3.60[Eval][v2][zh] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/3/2026, 12:09:16 AMSpecificity: 4Safety: 3Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 3
Solid incident response with good specificity and domain correctness, but safety could be improved by adding safer-first alternatives, and completeness is hindered by placeholders in the postmortem.
- v2zh4.20[Eval][v2][zh] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/3/2026, 12:08:55 AMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with concrete evidence and actionable steps; minor gaps in command specificity and postmortem completeness.
- v2zh4.40[Eval][v2][zh] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/3/2026, 12:08:39 AMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
A thorough and well-structured incident response with strong specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor improvements could include more explicit time ranges in commands and safer-first alternatives for mitigations.
- v2en4.60[Eval][v2][en] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/3/2026, 12:08:18 AMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Excellent incident response with high specificity, actionability, and domain correctness; minor safety and completeness gaps prevent a perfect score.
- v2en4.60[Eval][v2][en] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/3/2026, 12:08:02 AMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with high specificity, actionability, and domain correctness. Minor safety concern and placeholder gaps in postmortem prevent a perfect score.
- v2en4.60[Eval][v2][en] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/3/2026, 12:07:41 AMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor gaps in postmortem placeholders and a slight safety concern with the manual warm script.
- v1zh4.20[Eval][v1][zh] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/3/2026, 12:07:21 AMSpecificity: 4Safety: 3Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
A thorough and well-structured incident response with strong domain correctness and completeness, though minor improvements in specificity and safety would elevate it further.
- v1zh4.80[Eval][v1][zh] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/3/2026, 12:07:03 AMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor improvement: consider safer-first alternative before increasing DB pool size.
- v1zh4.40[Eval][v1][zh] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/3/2026, 12:06:42 AMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
A thorough and well-structured incident response with concrete evidence and actionable steps, scoring high across all dimensions.
- v1en4.20[Eval][v1][en] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/3/2026, 12:06:26 AMSpecificity: 4Safety: 3Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
A thorough and well-structured incident response with strong specificity and domain correctness. Minor improvements in safety (safer DB scaling) and actionability (script details) would make it excellent.
- v1en4.80[Eval][v1][en] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/3/2026, 12:06:09 AMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor safety concern with manual warm-up script risk, but overall outstanding.
- v1en4.40[Eval][v1][en] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/3/2026, 12:05:51 AMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
A thorough and well-structured incident response with strong specificity, safety, and domain correctness. Minor improvements could include more detailed commands and a pre-written warm script.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong, well-structured incident response with clear root cause and actionable steps. Minor gaps in specificity (relative time window) and completeness (missing timeline details) prevent a perfect score.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong incident response with high specificity, safety, and domain correctness. Minor improvements in actionability and completeness would make it excellent.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
A thorough and well-structured incident response that scores highly across all dimensions, with minor room for improvement in specificity and actionability of some commands.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor safety improvement possible but overall outstanding.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor safety improvement possible for hot-patch step.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with high specificity and actionability; minor safety and completeness gaps.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Excellent response with high specificity, actionability, and domain correctness; minor safety and completeness gaps prevent a perfect score.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong response with high specificity and actionability; minor safety and completeness gaps prevent a perfect score.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with clear root cause and actionable steps; minor gaps in specificity and completeness due to placeholders.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with clear root cause identification and actionable steps. Minor improvements in specificity and completeness would make it excellent.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong, well-structured incident response with high specificity and domain correctness. Minor improvements could include filling placeholders and adding time ranges to commands.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 4
A strong incident response with specific commands and clear mitigation. Minor improvements: replace placeholders for full copy-pasteability and adjust severity to SEV1.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
A strong, well-structured incident response with clear root cause analysis and actionable steps. Minor improvements in command specificity and actionability would make it excellent.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 4
A strong, well-structured incident response with clear evidence and actionable steps. Minor improvements in command specificity and severity classification would make it excellent.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong, well-structured incident response with clear root cause analysis and actionable steps. Minor improvements in specificity and completeness would make it excellent.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
A thorough and well-structured incident response that is specific, safe, actionable, correct, and complete. Minor improvements could include fully copy-pasteable commands and explicit safer-first alternatives.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v3zh4.20[Eval][v3][zh] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/3/2026, 12:00:01 AMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong, well-structured incident response with clear evidence and actionable steps. Minor improvements could include more precise time ranges in commands and fewer placeholders in the postmortem.
- v3zh4.80[Eval][v3][zh] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:59:44 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor safety improvement possible by adding safer-first alternatives.
- v3zh4.20[Eval][v3][zh] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:59:29 PMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong, well-structured incident response with concrete evidence and actionable steps, slightly held back by minor placeholders and a few less-immediate actions.
- v3en4.80[Eval][v3][en] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:59:11 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor safety concern with destructive fallback but overall outstanding.
- v3en4.80[Eval][v3][en] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:58:53 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor improvement: consider adding a shorter timeout (e.g., 8s) as a mitigation.
- v3en4.20[Eval][v3][en] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:58:37 PMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with clear evidence and actionable steps; minor gaps in specificity and completeness prevent top scores.
- v2zh4.00[Eval][v2][zh] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:58:20 PMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 3
Strong response with high specificity and domain correctness; safety and actionability are good but could be improved with more precise time ranges and fully filled postmortem sections.
- v2zh4.60[Eval][v2][zh] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:58:07 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Excellent incident response with high specificity, actionability, and domain correctness. Minor gaps in completeness (postmortem placeholders) and safety (acceptable risk in mitigation).
- v2zh4.20[Eval][v2][zh] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:57:50 PMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor improvements: add time ranges to all commands, fill in postmortem placeholders, and provide more detailed risk descriptions.
- v2en4.80[Eval][v2][en] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:57:33 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 5Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Excellent response with high specificity, safety, actionability, and domain correctness; completeness slightly reduced due to placeholder sections in postmortem draft.
- v2en4.20[Eval][v2][en] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:57:17 PMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong, well-structured incident response with high specificity, safety, and domain correctness. Minor improvements could include fully fleshing out the postmortem and adding more detail on enabling the circuit breaker.
- v2en4.80[Eval][v2][en] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:57:02 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v1zh4.20[Eval][v1][zh] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:56:45 PMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong, well-structured incident response with clear evidence and actionable steps. Minor improvements could include more precise commands and fuller postmortem sections.
- v1zh4.80[Eval][v1][zh] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:56:32 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v1zh4.80[Eval][v1][zh] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:56:19 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor safety concern with circuit breaker activation but rollback provided.
- v1en4.80[Eval][v1][en] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:56:04 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v1en4.60[Eval][v1][en] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:55:50 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with high specificity and actionability; minor safety concern and placeholder in postmortem draft.
- v1en4.60[Eval][v1][en] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:55:37 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor placeholder in postmortem timeline prevents a perfect 5 in completeness.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 5
A strong, well-structured incident response with clear evidence and actionable steps. Minor improvements: add time ranges to commands, ensure all rollback commands are explicit, and calibrate severity to SEV2.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 5
Excellent response with high specificity and actionability; minor severity misclassification prevents a perfect score.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 5
Excellent response with high specificity and actionability. Minor severity misclassification prevents perfect domain correctness score.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, actionability, and completeness. Minor issue in severity classification and a slight distraction with fast-json-stringify, but overall very strong.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 5
Excellent response with high specificity, actionability, and completeness. Minor safety concern and severity misclassification prevent a perfect score.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor safety concern on scaling down HPA but overall outstanding.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with high specificity and actionability; minor issues in severity classification and postmortem completeness.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 5
Excellent response with high specificity, actionability, and completeness. Minor issue in severity classification and one hypothesis not fully eliminated.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 5
Strong incident response with concrete evidence and actionable steps; minor issues in specificity (placeholder pod names) and domain correctness (severity misclassification).
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 4
Strong response with high specificity and actionability; minor severity misclassification and placeholder sections prevent a perfect score.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with high specificity and actionability; minor safety and completeness gaps prevent a perfect score.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with high specificity and actionability; minor gaps in safety (no explicit drain) and completeness (postmortem placeholders).
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with clear root cause identification and actionable steps. Minor improvements in command specificity and timeline completeness would make it excellent.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 5Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong, well-structured incident response with clear evidence and actionable steps. Minor improvements could include fully copy-pasteable commands and a more detailed rollback plan for the memory limit increase.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 5Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 5Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v3zh4.60[Eval][v3][zh] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:50:52 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with high specificity and actionability; minor safety concern and placeholder sections in postmortem prevent a perfect score.
- v3zh4.80[Eval][v3][zh] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:50:36 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v3zh4.80[Eval][v3][zh] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:50:22 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v3en4.80[Eval][v3][en] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:50:08 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v3en4.80[Eval][v3][en] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:49:53 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v3en5.00[Eval][v3][en] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:49:38 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 5Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Exemplary incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v2zh4.60[Eval][v2][zh] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:49:25 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong, well-structured incident response with high specificity and actionability; minor safety and completeness gaps prevent a perfect score.
- v2zh4.60[Eval][v2][zh] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:49:09 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with high specificity and actionability; minor safety and completeness gaps prevent a perfect score.
- v2zh4.60[Eval][v2][zh] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:48:56 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Excellent incident response with high specificity, actionability, and domain correctness. Minor gaps in safety (missing safer-first alternative for kill query) and completeness (postmortem placeholders).
- v2en4.60[Eval][v2][en] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:48:41 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with high specificity and actionability; minor safety concern and incomplete postmortem draft prevent a perfect score.
- v2en4.80[Eval][v2][en] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:48:29 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v2en4.80[Eval][v2][en] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:48:14 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 5Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Excellent response with high specificity, safety, actionability, and domain correctness; minor completeness gaps in postmortem draft place it at 4 rather than 5.
- v1zh4.80[Eval][v1][zh] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:47:58 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v1zh5.00[Eval][v1][zh] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:47:45 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 5Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v1zh4.80[Eval][v1][zh] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:47:29 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v1en4.80[Eval][v1][en] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:47:15 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v1en4.80[Eval][v1][en] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:46:59 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, actionability, and domain correctness. Minor safety concern with query killing but mitigated by read-only nature.
- v1en4.80[Eval][v1][en] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:46:45 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v3zh4.00[Eval][v3][zh] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/2/2026, 11:42:30 PMSpecificity: 4Safety: 3Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with high specificity and domain correctness; minor safety and completeness gaps prevent a perfect score.
- v3en4.80[Eval][v3][en] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/2/2026, 11:42:11 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor safety improvement could be adding a safer alternative before increasing DB pool size.
- v2zh4.00[Eval][v2][zh] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/2/2026, 11:41:52 PMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with clear evidence and actionable steps; minor gaps in specificity and safety prevent a perfect score.
- v2en4.20[Eval][v2][en] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/2/2026, 11:41:35 PMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with high specificity, safety, and domain correctness; minor gaps in actionability (script details) and completeness (placeholders in postmortem).
- v1zh4.60[Eval][v1][zh] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/2/2026, 11:41:20 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 3Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, correctness, and completeness. Minor safety improvement could be adding a safer-first alternative before manual cache warmup.
- v1en4.80[Eval][v1][en] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning6/2/2026, 11:41:05 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor safety concern with connection pool increase but rollback provided.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with high domain correctness and specificity; minor gaps in actionability and completeness due to placeholder fields and missing exact parameters.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong, well-structured incident response with clear evidence and actionable steps. Minor improvements could include more precise time ranges in commands and filling postmortem placeholders.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong incident response with clear root cause and actionable steps; minor gaps in command completeness and postmortem fill-ins.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong incident response with high specificity and domain correctness; minor gaps in actionability and completeness due to placeholder values and thin sections.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 3Completeness: 4
A solid incident response with good specificity and actionability, but the severity misclassification and a slightly risky mitigation action prevent a higher score.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
A strong, well-structured incident response with clear root cause analysis and actionable steps. Minor improvements could include filling placeholders and providing hosted zone IDs for full specificity.
- v3zh4.80[Eval][v3][zh] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:39:20 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor improvement: consider safer-first alternative before disabling Stripe.
- v3en4.80[Eval][v3][en] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:39:03 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor safety improvement could be adding safer-first alternatives before destructive changes.
- v2zh4.00[Eval][v2][zh] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:38:47 PMSpecificity: 4Safety: 3Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with high specificity and domain correctness; minor gaps in safety (lack of safer-first alternatives) and completeness (placeholder sections).
- v2en4.80[Eval][v2][en] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:38:32 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor safety quibble but overall outstanding.
- v1zh4.20[Eval][v1][zh] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:38:15 PMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong incident response with high specificity and domain correctness; minor gaps in safety (lack of safer-first alternative) and completeness (postmortem placeholders) prevent a perfect score.
- v1en4.80[Eval][v1][en] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage6/2/2026, 11:38:02 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor safety improvement possible by adding safer-first alternatives before disabling payment path.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 5
Excellent response with high specificity, actionability, and completeness; minor safety and domain correctness issues.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 5
Excellent response with high specificity, actionability, and completeness. Minor severity misclassification and safety could be improved with safer-first alternatives.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 5
Strong response with concrete evidence and actionable steps; minor severity misclassification and lack of safer-first alternatives prevent a perfect score.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor severity misclassification does not detract from overall quality.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v3zh4.60[Eval][v3][zh] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:36:22 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with high specificity and actionability; minor gaps in safety (no safer-first alternative for index) and completeness (placeholders).
- v3en4.60[Eval][v3][en] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:36:08 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, and domain correctness. Minor completeness gaps with placeholders in timeline and thin customer impact.
- v2zh5.00[Eval][v2][zh] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:35:53 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 5Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Exemplary incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v2en4.20[Eval][v2][en] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:35:35 PMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong incident response with clear root cause identification and actionable steps; minor gaps in specificity of time ranges and incomplete postmortem sections prevent a perfect score.
- v1zh4.60[Eval][v1][zh] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:35:16 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Excellent response with high specificity, actionability, and domain correctness. Minor safety and completeness gaps prevent a perfect score.
- v1en4.20[Eval][v1][en] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy6/2/2026, 11:34:58 PMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with clear root cause, actionable steps, and good safety considerations. Minor improvements could include adding time ranges to commands and expanding customer impact.
- v2zh4.40[Eval][v2][zh] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning5/25/2026, 10:24:39 PMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with strong specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor improvements in command completeness and safer-first alternatives would make it perfect.
- v2en4.60[Eval][v2][en] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning5/25/2026, 10:24:19 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Excellent response with high specificity, safety, actionability, and domain correctness; minor gaps in completeness (postmortem placeholders) and safety (no safer-first alternative for code change).
- v1zh4.80[Eval][v1][zh] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning5/25/2026, 10:24:01 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor safety improvement possible by adding a safer-first alternative for cache warmup.
- v1en4.40[Eval][v1][en] Cache stampede after Redis key expiry on Black Friday morning5/25/2026, 10:23:42 PMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
A thorough, well-structured incident response with strong evidence and actionable steps. Minor improvements could include fully copy-pasteable commands and a provided warm-up script.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong response with precise root cause and actionable steps; minor gaps in command specificity and timeline completeness.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong incident response with high specificity and domain correctness; minor gaps in safety (missing pre-revert health check) and completeness (placeholders in postmortem) prevent a perfect score.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong incident response with clear root cause analysis and actionable steps. Minor improvements in specificity (time windows) and completeness (filling placeholders) would make it excellent.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
A thorough and well-structured incident response with strong domain correctness and completeness, slightly held back by minor specificity gaps in commands.
- v2zh4.20[Eval][v2][zh] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage5/25/2026, 10:22:23 PMSpecificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with clear root cause analysis and actionable steps. Minor gaps in command specificity and postmortem completeness prevent a perfect score.
- v2en4.80[Eval][v2][en] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage5/25/2026, 10:22:08 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness. Minor safety improvement possible by adding safer-first alternatives for thread pool increase.
- v1zh4.80[Eval][v1][zh] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage5/25/2026, 10:21:47 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v1en4.80[Eval][v1][en] Third-party payment gateway timeouts cascade into checkout outage5/25/2026, 10:21:30 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 4
Strong response with high specificity and actionability; minor issues in severity classification and postmortem completeness.
- Specificity: 5Safety: 5Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- v2zh4.60[Eval][v2][zh] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy5/25/2026, 10:20:25 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Excellent response with high specificity, actionability, and domain correctness. Minor safety concern and placeholder gaps prevent a perfect score.
- v2en4.60[Eval][v2][en] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy5/25/2026, 10:20:09 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong, detailed incident response with excellent specificity and actionability; minor gaps in safety (no memory check before increasing max_connections) and completeness (placeholders in postmortem).
- v1zh4.60[Eval][v1][zh] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy5/25/2026, 10:19:52 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with high specificity and actionability; minor safety concern with database restart and incomplete postmortem placeholders.
- v1en4.80[Eval][v1][en] Payment service connection pool exhaustion after batch job deploy5/25/2026, 10:19:38 PMSpecificity: 5Safety: 4Actionability: 5Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 5
Excellent incident response with high specificity, safety, actionability, domain correctness, and completeness.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 4Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
Strong incident response with clear evidence and actionable steps. Minor improvements in specificity and completeness would make it excellent.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 3Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 4Completeness: 4
A strong incident response with concrete evidence and actionable steps, but minor gaps in safety (no safer alternative before terminating connections) and completeness (postmortem placeholders) prevent a perfect score.
- Specificity: 4Safety: 3Actionability: 4Domain correctness: 5Completeness: 4
A strong, well-structured incident response with clear evidence and actionable steps, though safety could be improved by prioritizing less destructive mitigations.